Ian Lynagh <[email protected]> writes:

> * Text.PrettyPrint doesn't give you a way to print any sort of packed
>   string type without unpacking it. This is waiting on there being a
>   suitable unicode packed string type for it to use.

How serious an issue is this?  I guess most of the strings that this
module prints are quite short, so wouldn't the unpacking cost be
negligible?

_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to