On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 10:36:33PM -0400, Adam Vogt wrote: > I intentionally didn't set -e because I don't know how to use that and > have the script ignore the failure that the script from exiting on the > failure that must happen on the amend-record.
Assuming I've understood you correctly, with not(). > The other suggestions wouldn't be bad, though explicit copyright and > licencing for a (hopefully transient) test case seems pretty excessive: I > imagine actually fixing the bug (only affects old-style repos) would > probably be less effort :) You ought to be able to just copy-and-paste it from one of the other recently edited tests or bugs. I think being picky about license declarations is a good habit for a FOSS community to get into. PS: please post in context, trimming irrelevant quotation; I find "top-posting" hard to read. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
