Reinier Lamers <[email protected]> writes: > On Monday 06 April 2009 11:03:08 Trent W.Buck wrote: >> Mon Apr 6 19:01:53 EST 2009 Trent W. Buck <[email protected]> >> * Haddockize literate comments in Darcs.Patch.Properties. >> I converted some LaTeX math to the corresponding Unicode characters, >> but it seems that Haddock 2.4 is back in the 70s: it converts high-bit >> bytes to control characters and similar gibberish. Hopefully cases >> like this will encourage the Haddock codebase to get up to speed on >> the whole internationalization scene. > > As I have stated before in mail and IRC discussions: it is not haddock > or darcs that is stuck in the seventies, it is our nourishing mother > GHC that is stuck in the seventies (or more like the nineties, > actually). A Haskell Char is supposed to be a Unicode code point, but > hGetStr returns Char's that have the input's bytes as their numeric > value. Effectively, it interprets anything you feed it as Latin-1.
Fair enough. Apologies for the ill-directed ranting; as you might imagine, I was quite grumpy at the time :-) _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
