> Can anyone give me an example of one such merge that is "complicated" in a > different VCS (e.g. requires several steps, or human intervention) but is > simple in Darcs?
Simple: you have 3 repos A, B and C, A being the "central", B and C being "sons" of A. Assume B and C have a list of independent changes made above a common history present in A. Then, when you want to propagage these histories between B and C, you have to create "merge patches" that explicitely do the operation. This happens in Git, Mercurial and Bazaar, with Git having the advantage of creating the merge patch automatically. So Git comes closest to darcs on this task (no extra human intervention). At least this is how it worked 6 months ago when I tried these 3 systems. guillaume _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
