For the record, I like at least some of Stephen's "stiff verbosity". This reads really well:
> Human programmers generally don't think about two patch sets that > implement different features as being ordered. Well, neither does > Darcs. Darcs will pull a set of patches that may implement > several features, and automatically reorder them so that as many > as possible apply without conflict. You don't have to worry about > it until a conflict arises, and Darcs can do this at least as well > as you can, and faster. Experience shows that when a conflict > does arise, it is normally due to features that have genuinely > conflicting requirements in the implementation, that some human > must resolve. This is exactly what you want. Thanks Daniel for working on docs and stimulating the discussion. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
