On Tuesday 14 April 2009, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Generally very nice. Replying to darcs-users to get others' take, > > [email protected] writes: > > +- **Human Friendly** - Most VCSs impose a historical orer on
I think it was meant to be order or orer on the line above. > > changes. But humans +don't work like that. We don't think of two > > different changes that implement +different features as having a > > particular order. Well, neither does Darcs. In +Darcs, you give a > > name to each patch (e.g. 'feature X') and you tell Darcs which +set > > of patches you want (e.g. "I'd like feature Y and Z but not X"). > > Darcs will +know what to do with this. This makes some "complicated" > > mergers not complicated +at all in Darcs. -- Dan _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
