On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 13:24:30 +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote: > $ darcs get --quiet http://darcs.net/ delete-me > $ darcs pull --repo delete-me -a > http://physics.oregonstate.edu/~roundyd/code/darcs > darcs: mergeConflictingNons failed in geteff with ix > {{ > |hunk ./darcs.cabal 317 > [...]
Is this a known bug? It sounds like we need to go through another round of boiling down to get a minimal test case. I'll bet that if we did this, David would be interested to see our case. http://wiki.darcs.net/index.html/Forensics > Darcs really does still suck at large-scale, non-ephemeral branches. Yes. > It certainly is; it has already given me a use case for "darcs pull > --complement droundy droundy.disabled". This is the kind of thing that could go into a darcs tip of the month: how do I "ban" patches? Kevin Quick could be a good guest author for that :-) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgphWQcYyU609.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
