Ganesh Sittampalam <[email protected]> writes: > So darcs always (and has always) gzipped hashed pristine, and has never > gzipped non-hashed pristine? About non-hashed, I unfortunately have no idea. But hashed is definitely a non-issue.
Eric Kow writes: > It's not systematic, hence the concern. gzReadFilePS can accept either > gzipped files or not (which is useful because you don't know if the remote > repo has chosen compression, or in case you are grabbing patch files from > multiple repos), but this means you can't tell if the underlying file has > been gzipped by darcs or not. It can read those, sure, but hashed pristine files are never non-gzipped, so it doesn't matter there. For plain pristine, you should be able to just run darcs repair to fix any crc issues, may they arise, without compromising pristine integrity. Yours, Petr. -- Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
