Reinier Lamers wrote:
* have a better user interface
* run faster, especially when run in parallel on a multicore
* allow you to reproduce failures
* pass
This is a great contribution! Thanks a lot.
I pulled from your repo into darcs head and ran the unit tests on a x86_64
ubuntu intrepid machine:
$ time dist/build/unit/unit
...
Properties Test Cases Total
Passed 55 36 91
Failed 0 0 0
Total 55 36 91
real 6m25.218s
user 4m12.060s
sys 0m4.040s
The shell-based functional tests all passed as well. I think this is the first time I've seen darcs with all tests
passing. Excellent.
Thanks also for creating testrunner and being willing to retire it so quickly when you found the (presumably) more
suitable test-framework. And, good luck in the new job, I hope it's easy so we don't lose you. :)
-Simon
PS I wonder if it's safe to run the shell tests in parallel ? If so, that would be a good reason to hook them up to
test-framework. And adding -j8 didn't run the unit tests any faster, fwiw.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
