Eric Kow <[email protected]> writes: > The candidates appear to be > unrecord-setpref.sh > unrecord.sh > unrevert-add.sh > unrevert-replace-moved.sh > unrevert.sh > unrevert_cancel.sh > what_sl.sh > whatsnew-file.sh > whatsnew.sh > workingdir.sh > > Also, one doubt at the end, but I'll just ask if Ganesh could check it, > since the two of you know what you're doing. Ouch! I haven't seen anything like this on neither POSIX nor Win32... Anything specific?
> I don't yet understand the significance of the > (BL.fromChunks . return) here. The return is really just (:[]) and fromChunks is a way to construct a lazy bytestring: it goes from a list of strict bytestrings to a lazy bytestring. The return may be flipped to (:[]) for better readability I guess? Yours, Petr. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
