On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:16:17 +0200
jh granarolo <[email protected]> wrote:
> As I see things, something like this :
>
> addfile A
> move A B
>
> implies that A was first added then moved to B, resulting in a
> repository containing only B.
>
> But this :
>
> move A B
> addfile A
>
> should, at least for me, always mean that A was moved to B,
> then another file named A was added, resulting in a repository
> containing A and B.
Yes, and only way to interpret it right is by consulting the
"context", that is, the situation before the patch ("if there was a
file A to move, then it's the latter case, otherwise..."). Surely not
ideal.
ciao, lele.
--
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
[email protected] | -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
