On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 01:02:28AM -0400, Max Battcher wrote: > As for the "non-standard" directives, I don't think it would result > in "lock in". ReST was designed for "extension" directives and > theoretically other reST parsers should allow for extension plugins > to support new directives.
Granted. What I meant was that if you say "sphinxInclude" (I forget the actual directive) instead of "include", then that basically gets ignored and the result is that building a sphinxized document with a non-sphinx thing results in only the top-level file being rendered. > Worst case, the reST using those directives won't work and will need > to be rewritten and I don't think that will be a horrible problem. Right; (nowadays) I'm happy to worry about that later. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
