Eric Kow <[email protected]> writes: > Would you like to take (part of) this one on, Trent?
I'm mainly available weekends at the moment. If I get 2.3 into Debian (I couldn't until yesterday) I'll look at this today, otherwise it'll probably wait until next weekend. > I think it would make sense to do this in three stages: > * Minor style tweaks in cabal test. > * Support tests/failing-foo.sh convention for bugs. > > Then look at David's patches against his repo (ie. sans conflictors): > * move bugs into tests/ directory. > * mark issue 525 is no longer failing. > * clean up and mark as passing the broken-pipe.sh test. > * mark check.sh as failing. > * mark dist-v as passing. > * mark nfs-failure.sh as passing (even though it might not be fixed). > * mark issue 1043 test as passing. > * mark issue27 test as passing. > * mark check.sh test as passing. > * add failing test demonstrating nasty conflict markings. > > And finally... > * Resolve conflicts between David and mainline test suite work. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
