On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Jason Dagit <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Eric Kow <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> > - What is the process for overthrowing representatives?  Example: Eric
>> >   goes insane and decides that Darcs should be rewritten in Emacs Lisp,
>> >   but everybody else in the community disagrees.  (This process might
>> >   just be "well, fork it".)
>>
>
> Actually, we had some discussion on IRC about this a couple weeks ago.  If
> I recall correctly the consensus at that time was that we should rewrite
> darcs to run on the GPU using one of the shader languages.  This has the
> advantage that we could begin working on a nice 3d gui for darcs, take
> advantage of massively parallel computations and be the first VCS to run on
> the GPU.
>
>
This is a closer reality than I realized:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2009-August/065338.html

Jason
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to