On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:51:08 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > > How do you think we should treat bugs where the original reporter > > > answers only slowly? With those, you can't have zero chatting > > > bugs. > > > > Those would be stuck on need-info as long as we're waiting on the > > original reporter. > > I don't see a real difference between "need-info" and "chatting", > unless you have a reactor that automatically sets the issue to > "chatting" whenever somebody who isn't the owner[1] posts to it.
That's the practical difference right now. Still in principle, need-info is used when we know precisely what info we're looking for (what darcs version are you using, please?). On the other hand, we could get just merge unread/chatting into a single untriaged status. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpF6DhJazs2h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
