Sun Aug 30 10:35:38 BST 2009 Ganesh Sittampalam <[email protected]> * I've made a branch abstracting out darcs-specific stuff
New patches:
[I've made a branch abstracting out darcs-specific stuff Ganesh Sittampalam <[email protected]>**20090830093538 Ignore-this: 7ab1e621936be35d180b4115c7d05b00 ] hunk ./Review/DarcsHS.page 65 it essential for proper decoupling of development work in the future. Part of the separation might be aided by my new point about "hash safety". + Ganesh (30/08/09): I've done some work myself to see if this is + feasible, and the results are in + http://darcs.vm.spiny.org.uk/~ganesh/gsoc-review-2009/ganesh/{hashed-storage,darcs-hs} + I think it passes the same set of tests as the version of your code + that I built on (though I had to make some changes to darcs-hs to get your + version to build at all because I think you haven't pushed some patch to it). + + The result of my refactoring is that substantially less code is + "darcs-specific", and the Storage.Hashed.Darcs module isn't a + dependency for anything else in hashed-storage (and thus could and should + easily be moved to darcs itself). It's not entirely ready to commit - there are + a few outstanding issues to be discussed first - but it's nearly there. + 2. Deleting files on Windows. Ganesh: Win32 removeFile workaround: not used consistently, should be hidden behind Context: [Crypt is inside src, indent correctly Kamil <[email protected]>**20090828183152 Ignore-this: e47a3802cb488f454076fb74aa45f195 ] [TAG 2009-08-28 (autotag) [email protected]**20090828103009 Ignore-this: 3d59d2305bf8bba773bb59f02b1614a4 ] Patch bundle hash: 77007b2b9a9cc64418135cb2d303f645932d7271
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
