Gwern Branwen <[email protected]> writes: > Are there that many double or triple uses of the dangerous functions > in Darcs code? (Is the ratified module technique even foolproof? It > would seem as vulnerable to someone using the > Ratified.getContents/whatever 'just to get it to compile' as to > someone just reusing the function in a ignored module.) You are missing the point. If you disable a module from checks, it'll be easy to add a new bad use of a banned function unwittingly to that module.
> Which is uglier, risking the small chance of missing a double use, or > supporting this ratified module stuff forever? Why forever? _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
