> whatsnew
> --------
>
> traditional, darcs 1.0.9: 0.25 seconds
> traditional, darcs 2.2.1: 0.28 seconds
> traditional, darcs 2.3.0: 25.35 seconds
>
> hashed, darcs 2.2.1: 6.74 seconds
> hashed, darcs 2.3.0: 0.07 seconds
>
>
> get (local from traditional vs hashed)
> -----------
>
> traditional, darcs 1.0.9: 8.0 seconds
> traditional, darcs 2.2.1: 18.2 seconds
> traditional, darcs 2.3.0: 34.3 seconds
>
> hashed, darcs 2.2.1: 5.7 seconds
> hashed, darcs 2.3.0: 6.2 seconds
>
>
> The solution seems to be to switch to darcs 1 hashed format locally. I
> note that darcs-2.3 now defaults to the hashed format when getting a new
> repo. However we get no advice about existing repos and get hit with up
> to a 100x slowdown.
These benchmarks are very helpful. Thanks!
As a result, I'm going to look at converting some of my repos over the hashed
format soon.
Mark
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
