On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Nathan Gray<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:42:36AM -0400, Mark Stosberg wrote: >> It seems safe to me to upgrade the developer repos to the hashed format, as >> they only usually push and pull from the alpha repo (in oldfashioned format), >> using a Darcs 2 binary. > > Seems safe to me also. > > You could convert alpha and beta to hashed as well, so long as > changes are pushed from there to production using darcs-2, rather > than being pulled by darcs-1. At least, I think darcs-1 cannot > pull from hashed repos.
My memory of such things is always terrible. So I googled it: http://blog.worldmaker.net/2008/aug/04/users-guide-darcs-2/ Near the end is a little table in the Summary section (reproduced here, but in terrible quality, I recommend just clicking the link): Format Darcs 1 push/pull Darcs 2 push/pull darcs-1 Yes Yes hashed No Yes darcs-2 No Yes The second column says what darcs1 can do. Darcs1 can push/pull with darcs-1 format repos only. I could have sworn darcs 1.0.9 understood hashed, but it appears not. Trent: I see that the manual does not mention what versions of darcs support which formats: http://darcs.net/manual/node6.html Jason _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
