Eric Kow wrote: > Here's a new UI proposal by Florent: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 14:34:15 +0000, Florent Becker wrote: >> Testing patches at record time is nice, but it can really disrupt the >> workflow, and the temptation is always great to use --no-test. But using >> --no-test is not satisfactory either: who as never sent or pushed a junk >> patch that way. I propose that a line 'Untested' be added to the >> description of any patch recorded with --no-test. It can then be removed >> by running amend-record --edit and testing. >> >> When sending and pushing, darcs should test any patch that has the >> Untested tag (one by one). pull should also warn about pulling untested >> patches. > > My take is that we should keep things simple by making amend/record > --no-test and push/send --test the default (interestingly push/send > --test would be after cherry picking of patches but before the actual > action). > > Note that there is a pending list of default switches to swap around > on http://wiki.darcs.net/DefaultSwitches >
The point of the Untested tag here is that if you send/push to multiple repositories, you don't want to re-test them every time. amend-record would allow you to test and bless a patch without sending/pushing it. amend-record --test should probably silently remove the 'Untested' tag. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
