[email protected] writes: > I amended and re-sent. And just curious now: In a case like this, > would it be better to re-edit and create a completely new patch, > throwing away the original? And if this was done, should the new patch > get a different name or could the name of the earlier patch be > re-used?
As a reviewer, I don't care if an amendment also renamed the patch, so long as --in-reply-to is used. Without it, such an amendment won't be threaded correctly by my newsreader. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
