On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 23:09:05 +0100, Kamil Dworakowski wrote: > One of the test patches I have sent tests amend-record of a checkpoint > tag. For that test I have created a repo with a checkpoint tag in an > older version of darcs and included it under tests/repos.
Hmm: that actually opens a whole new question. I'm going to break this out into a new thread: See <[email protected]> for the old parent. > I agree that it is highly unlikely someone will try to monkey with > (amend, obliterate and such) a checkpoint with new darcs, though I > guess it is still possible. Thanks for paying attention to corner cases. We should take Murphy's Law very seriously so you've got the right idea. One question I have for other darcs hackers is: does Darcs assume in any way that tag patches are empty? Because right now, it is possible to amend a tag and add stuff to it. Should that be illegal? -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpuWHQ5K3tPu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
