Eric wrote: > > So part of the goal for me is to reduce the cost of trying Darcs out. > > Having to convert your repo is cost, so if we support SVN somehow we > > kill that cost. But another form of cost is having to worry that Darcs > > will let you do things that you can't later push back to the SVN repo > > (because you're still not yet committed to Darcs; you're just dipping > > your toes). So that's my goal. 100% compatibility, zero psychological > > cost. Just try it! Darcs as a better SVN client. See what I mean?
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 22:49:46 +0200, Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > So I will be in favor of, a warning, or a confirmation by the user. > And maybe not based on a change of the repo format, but more a "do this repo > has an SVN repo in its _darcs/prefs/repos list". You mean something like "warning! SVN repositories do not support darcs replace patches... are you sure you want to create this?" I could live with something working like the --case-ok stuff where it just refuses to do this but gives you a way to force it... -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpA0apZO2OcS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
