On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:09:27 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > > The usual solution for this is to consider the command line option > > that came last. > > +1. > > My fuzzy understanding is that we can't do that until the whole argument > parsing issue is cleaned up. (IIRC, covered in another recent thread.)
http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2009-September/021413.html I've also added to issue1550 the point there there appears to be some sort of consensus on this. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpPYfkJpmKy8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
