On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Eric Kow <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 07:53:23 +0200, Petr Rockai wrote: > > Sorry for the delay, both issues (missing darcs.tgz and incorrect header > check) > > should be fixed now. You need to update darcs-benchmark to 0.1.1 from > Hackage. > > Yep! Here's the kind of output I get after doing > > cabal update > cabal install darcs-benchmark > mkdir /tmp/bm > cd /tmp/bm > darcs-benchmark --get > darcs-benchmark darcs-2.3.1 darcs >
Eric, could you clarify the version of 'darcs' above? Is this the current HEAD? If so, then yes, some uses have regressed it would seem. I think we can actually make them faster than darcs 2.2 and older if we just work on it a bit. Thanks for taking the time to post these numbers! It's so important to look at the numbers periodically when doing such massive refactorings. Jason
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
