On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 16:39:43 +1100, Trent W.Buck wrote: > Sun Oct 11 16:38:38 EST 2009 Trent W. Buck <[email protected]> > * Accept issue1645: w -l should ignore symlinks.
I'm going to apply this now and hope maybe somebody will complain if they object... > +## Test for issue1645 - whatsnew -l should not consider symlinks to be > +## "real" files in the working tree. > +. ../tests/lib # Load some portability helpers. > +rm -rf R f # Another script may have left a mess. > +darcs init --repo R # Create our test repos. > + > +cd R > +echo 'Example content.' > ../f # a file outside the repo > +ln -s ../f # a symlink to same inside the repo > +darcs whatsnew -l >log > +fgrep 'No changes!' log # Darcs shouldn't report any changes. Note that I have on some occasions used symlinks within a repo and tracked both sides in Darcs. Although in that case, I came to the conclusion that I was just being foolish and did something else instead (wrote a makefile target to re-create symlinks) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
