On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 08:22:47AM +0000, Eric Kow wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 18:33:13 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: >> Why HTML? Is this something that goes in the repo, but actually is >> only ever used for the darcs.net copy? > > Trent, I realise you'd prefer to put the entire web content on the wiki. > [...] I think there should be a very limited core set of > 'official' web pages, ie. the front page, donations and thank-you. I > don't expect this set to grow very fast (most things should go on the > wiki) [...]
Fair enough. I only find it slightly annoying. Thinking about it, my chief concerns are that 1) the number of hand-written pages will keep grow; and 2) they (might) look inconsistent with the wiki. As you're confident about (1) not being an issue, I won't worry about it. > Now for A and B: I like wikis (honest!), but I still feel that for some > official documentation (again, a very *limited* subset), we should have > fairly static content that goes through a review and approval process > (rather than just the sort of tacit acceptance of "nobody has reverted > it yet"). Ah, I forgot the review policy for the wiki is quite liberal. > Am I just being old-fashioned and stupid? Dunno. I also assumed you can "lock" files in the wiki, such that they can only be modified by people with ssh push access. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
