Excerpts from Reinier Lamers's message of Sat Oct 31 23:58:51 +0100 2009: > Hi, > > 2009/10/31 Trent W. Buck <[email protected]>: > >> Also, it seems odd that "In-Reply-To" is set, but I'm not familiar > >> with that header. > > > > This is perfectly natural. Along with Message-ID and References, it > > allows MUAs[0] to correctly display a multi-email discussion as a DAG, > > even when the Subject field is changed. > > > > See also darcs send --in-reply-to :-) > > > > [0] Apart from Apple Mail, blech! > > More importantly, also GMail ignores In-Reply-To and threads messages > by subjects. Even mildly geeky young people now get this wrong and > send non-replies with the reply button, changing the subject. That > kind of thing makes me feel old.
Are you sure that In-Reply-To is completely ignored by GMail? -- Nicolas Pouillard http://nicolaspouillard.fr _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
