On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 17:51:16 +0000, Eric Kow wrote:
> 2. The Unicode guru review: are the things the patch bundle
>    says it does the right things to do?  It sounds like this is not just
>    a matter of understanding the specs, but having real life experience
>    and flamewar scorch marks to go along with it.

Oh! I hadn't realised that John Cowan has already responded when I wrote
this. See http://bugs.darcs.net/patch37

Trent said:
| John Cowan is a Unicode guru, and I asked him to take a quick look at
| this patch.  Here are his comments:
| 
| twb> Darcs is a VCS implemented in Haskell.  There is a patch to make
| twb> it understand (in some places) Unicode, instead of just treating
| twb> everything as sequences of bytes.  Can you recommend someone to
| twb> review this patch from a "knows about Unicode" perspective?
| 
| jcowan> I'll look at it myself.  Though I'm no Haskell maven, so I may
| jcowan> have questions.  [...]  I'm looking at the .diff.  I can sort
| jcowan> of imagine the original.  Hmm, the XML escaping looks
| jcowan> problematic, unless it's something about laziness I don't
| jcowan> understand.  You need to convert & to & first before the
| jcowan> others are done.  Slavoj Žižek!  Cool! [...]  Except for the
| jcowan> XML escaping, all looks fine.

Reinier replied: 
|| It looks like John Cowan was reading the '.' operator the wrong way. The 
replace
|| of '&' by '&quot' is the last line of the function, but it is the first
|| operation that takes place.

Does this mean we can put away the request for guru?

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to