On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 08:36:00PM +0100, Florent Becker wrote: > > > Hm, I don't suppose you could simply express it as pull --dont-apply or > > --no-working-tree, similar to push --no-working-tree (for pushing to a > > "dumb" remote host which lacks Darcs)? > > It could be called pull --dont-apply -O
I don't see why you need the --dont-apply. After all, you don't have to say "darcs send --dont-email -o". I'm currently leaning towards "darcs pull -o" (in which case "darcs push -o" ought to do what "darcs send -o" currently does). > I think darcs pull -O is the bad kind of options, where > adding -O changes the post-condition of pull. "pull" and "pull -o" both put some patches into a repository. In the first case it is a "directory format" repository, and in the second case a "file format" repository. That's similar reasoning to why I think pull and apply should be merged. Both are just applying patches from a repository, just stored in different formats. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
