On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:48:08 +0100, Reinier Lamers wrote: > > Also, I know this is the second time I'm asking this (but this time with > > some > > variants which you may happier with than my first request) : I'd like you to > > consider a second time the possible merits of using diff+patch to submit a > > nice > > clean bundle without the rollbacks or conflicts and with some patches > > consolidated or divided up as you see fit. To make this simpler for you, > > perhaps do this only against the patch bundle context and not the current > > repo > > state (let somebody else worry about the recent conflicts). > > I believe I did that. It's there on the patch tracker. If those are not what > you > mean, please elaborate.
Ah! I meant a darcs patch :-) I'll have a closer look at your comments later as things settle down. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgp9wXr8vALo9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
