---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Thomas Hartman <[email protected]> Date: Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:59 PM Subject: Re: [darcs-users] patch tag problem, "hash failure in" To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected], Jeremy Shaw <[email protected]>
> Is it possible that some white space or UTF-8 differences have crept in? > Something that would cause the hash algorithm to return a different value > than what darcs expects? Well, I did upgrade from happstack 3 to happstack 4. The darcs pull urls are served by a happstack fileserve function, which changed from 3 to 4. Whereas darcs get [email protected]:/r/... urls are just served by the file system. Many other things have changed. For example, patch-tag has wikis now... but I can't think of anything else that would cause public urls to break. Mulling... On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Jason Dagit <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Thomas Hartman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm in the middle of an upgrade to patch-tag and I'm afraid I hit a >> snag. Public url pulls no longer work. > > I don't have a solution at this time, but could we get a bit more > information about the problem please? > > For example, you said "in the middle of an upgrade to patch-tag", could you > be more precise about what you have changed most recently? > > >> >> error message is: >> >> thart...@ubuntu:~/tmp/tmp2>darcs get >> http://patch-tag.com/r/mae/happstack/pullrepo happstack4 >> Hash failure in >> >> http://patch-tag.com/r/mae/happstack/pullrepo/_darcs/pristine.hashed/0000000702-4929871df9f6758c435766f85d6f92be31750b7dbb8255ae4c5242265f8f5f7f >> >> darcs failed: Couldn't fetch >> >> `0000000702-4929871df9f6758c435766f85d6f92be31750b7dbb8255ae4c5242265f8f5f7f' >> in subdir pristine.hashed from sources: >> >> thisrepo:/home/thartman/tmp/tmp2/happstack4 >> cache:/home/thartman/.darcs/cache >> repo:http://patch-tag.com/r/mae/happstack/pullrepo > > So the "Couldn't fetch" bit could possibly be the wrong error description. > I suspect the more meaningful bit is "Hash failure in". Did patch-tag do > anything to serve the data to darcs? Is it possible that some white space > or UTF-8 differences have crept in? Something that would cause the hash > algorithm to return a different value than what darcs expects? > > Jason > -- Need somewhere to put your code? http://patch-tag.com Want to build a webapp? http://happstack.com -- Need somewhere to put your code? http://patch-tag.com Want to build a webapp? http://happstack.com _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
