Hi Joachim, On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:37:48 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > Ganesh Sittampalam <[email protected]> writes: > > This seems to already have been applied. > > That was me. I was expecting darcswatch to close the patch for me; I > guess patch34 predates that darcswatch-fu.
There seems to be an issue with darcswatch marking obsoleted (or otherwise) patches as accepted when there is actually a later patch that replaces them. Any thoughts on a good solution? Maybe some mechanism for scoring patches as the best candidates? needs-review gets points, and so does being more recent. Being marked 'obsoleted' gets minus points... Thanks, -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpCq3F0xaWr9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
