On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Dave Love wrote:
Jason Dagit <[email protected]> writes:
Would you be willing to step up as the maintainer of this code?
According to the above policy, that is what we need.
Well, I am maintaining it, but I'll have to say no as I can't promise to
respond to reports within a week. I think that's an unrealistic
requirement, and even two weeks is stretching it for people who might be
on holiday, or can't respond to mail. After all, reports about darcs
itself aren't necessarily treated that promptly. [That's not meant to
sound surly, should it come across like that.]
[this is talking about http://wiki.darcs.net/Development/Policy]
I agree that a week is unreasonable and I think we should change the
requirement. I suggest either a month, or some vaguer statement that we'll
remove stuff that seems to be unmaintained.
Ganesh
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
