On Sat, 26 Dec 2009, Reinier Lamers wrote:
Op dinsdag 22 december 2009 23:03 schreef Ganesh Sittampalam:
- issue121 "wish: amend-record --ask-deps"
This is not on our to-be-fixed-for-2.4 list (
http://bugs.darcs.net/iss...@columns=title,id,activity,status,assignedto&@sort=activity&@group=priority&@filter=topic,status&@pagesize=50&@startwith=0&topic=34&status=-1,1,2,3,4,5,6,16,17&@dispname=Open2.4
).
Good point (I actually thought it was on the 2.4 list, but it seems it
only had a brief visit to it around the time of the last sprint).
Nonetheless, is there any reason not to get it in for 2.4?
- interactive patch editing
I'm not sure we ever really finished the design of the user interface. We
probably should before 2.4...
We tried discussing this a number of times. I haven't tried this feature out
yet. It's really something we should have, but it's also easy to do it wrong.
If we can't get some more people to try it out and say if they consider this
a release quality UI, I'm afraid we should hold it until 2.5.
Sounds reasonable, though in that case we'd have to disable the current
implementation, at least on the release branch.
- darcs rebase (also known as transplant)
I've got
quite a long way with the basic infrastructure for it, to the point that I
can use it myself to rebase patches, though it's not exactly user friendly
yet :-)
Exciting to hear! I'm interested in hearing the UI design. I haven't studied
the darcs rebase plans to any depth, but I'd say we need a UI that makes hairy
things possible while making the senseful things the easiest.
Agreed. Just need to figure out how to do that :-)
Ganesh
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
