FWIW, permissioning isues are of the "can't push to a private directory", there is no breach of private data involved.
Goes without saying, I hope to have this fixed once and for all post haste. 2009/12/28 Thomas Hartman <[email protected]>: > I believe I have a work-around (described in the wiki) that allows me > to move forward without disabling hard linking, thanks. > > Qualified with "I believe" because I just got feedback that indicates > there are still permissioning bugs, but I don't believe these are > related to hard linking. > > thomas. > > 2009/12/28 Eric Kow <[email protected]>: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:47:44 -0800, Thomas Hartman wrote: >>> I would still like to know what is the mechanism behind this, and is >>> there any way to turn it off? It blocks some useful sanity checks. >> >> Was your message to turn off hard-linking motivated by this email, or is >> this a separate issue? >> >> If I understand correctly, this thread was about the fact that >> permissions of hashed files can be changed 'at a distance' due to hard >> linking. >> >> In the other message, you found a workaround involving making _darcs >> world readable. Is the spooky action problem still relevant, then? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> >> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> darcs-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users >> >> > _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
