Op maandag 04 januari 2010 10:06 schreef Trent W. Buck: > Reinier Lamers <[email protected]> writes: > > * Investigate how to handle the ICU dependency on Windows; if we have > > to, just bundle the ICU source. > > From the Debian integrator to the release manager: > > It will annoy me if the source tarball for 2.4 contains icu, because > I'll have to either roll a new tarball (i.e. unbundle it) or document > the copyright details of all of icu. > > Since I don't care about Windows users, I'd prefer to provide them with > pre-built binaries rather than include icu in the source tarball.
We could also make a special tarball for hackage that contains ICU, so that people can do "cabal install darcs", and keep the other darcs source distributions ICU-free. But that would be extra work for every release. It would be more logical if the text-icu package bundled ICU in its source (as I've heard zlib does). Reinier
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
