Hello Luca, Op woensdag 23 december 2009 12:00 schreef je: > Have you already applied this? I may have found a bug on it.
I considered applying it tonight, but it raised some more questions on IRC:
[21:26] <Heffalump> it effectively throws away the existing cache, right?
[21:26] * Heffalump is a bit dubious about that
[21:27] <kowey> dubious about that being a good idea?
[21:31] <tux_rocker> would restructuring the cache be much faster than just
rebuilding it?
[21:32] <idnar> doesn't throwing the cache away potentially lose data?
I think Heffalump was really dubious about throwing away the existing cache
being a good idea.
Additionally, the patch introduces two compiler warnings:
[52 of 63] Compiling Darcs.Repository.Cache ( src/Darcs/Repository/Cache.hs,
dist/build/unit/unit-tmp/Darcs/Repository/Cache.o )
src/Darcs/Repository/Cache.hs:114:29:
Warning: This binding for `f' shadows the existing binding
bound at src/Darcs/Repository/Cache.hs:113:39
In the definition of `hashedBucket'
src/Darcs/Repository/Cache.hs:116:48:
Warning: This binding for `s' shadows the existing binding
bound at src/Darcs/Repository/Cache.hs:113:37
In a case alternative
Bye,
Reinier
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
