Trent W. Buck <[email protected]> added the comment: Daniel Dickison wrote: > On Jan 13, 2010, at 9:59 PM, Trent W. Buck wrote: >> I'm concerned that using "_darcsfoo" both times might trip unrelated >> bugs in pending. I suggest using _darcsbar the second time, and >> simply doing a normal record. >> >> touch _darcsfoo >> darcs whatsnew -ls --boring >> darcs record --look-for-adds --boring _darcsfoo >> >> touch _darcsbar >> darcs whatsnew -ls --boring >> darcs record --look-for-adds --boring _darcsbar > > As far as I can tell, `record' doesn't take the --boring flag > (though maybe it should?).
Oops. By all means, use "add", then. > Also, if we do use `record' instead of `add', I presume we also need > to pass `--all' so it doesn't get stuck at the prompt? Yep. I habitually use rec -lam instead of add + record. > (though I think that would still require a `revert' between the two > in order to test `whatsnew'). Recorded changes won't show up in w -l. __________________________________ Darcs bug tracker <[email protected]> <http://bugs.darcs.net/patch135> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
