Eric Kow <[email protected]> writes:
> Woo!  Does this also resolve issue1710?  If so, it sounds like we also
> need a regression test for this (in hashed-storage, if not Darcs)
No, of course not. These are unrelated. Issue1710 is in darcs, not in
hashed-storage. Either failure to invalidate index at the right point,
or a premature rebuild of the index (i.e. with out-of-date
pristine). Since we cannot reproduce, it's hard to track down.

Yours,
   Petr.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to