On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:01:17 +0000, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: > I think having the filler patches available via 'k' is quite important for > consistency with the rest of the interactive selection UI. If you have > patches A > and B being offered initially by record, with B depending on A (I think this > can > happen if A is a hunk patch and B is a replace patch), then B defaults to 'n' > if > you select A, but you can still use 'k' to go back and select B, which then > automatically selects 'A' too.
Actually, one more reason to show the filler patches is that then users know they have to revert them. It also ties into the hypothetical revert-when-recording feature. OK, is there a good way to get out of indecision mode? I think that maybe with the right explanation, we can make the filler patches obvious. Ganesh: would you be comfortable making the final call? -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
