On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 08:42:18 -0700, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote: > I was referring to the results in here: > > http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2010-January/022975.html
> Test type darcs-2.3.1 darcs-2.3.98 > --------------- ------------------- ------------------- > annotate 18.4s 187.0M 36.8s 180.0M Thanks for tracking that down. For more context, see http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2010-January/022963.html It looks like this was a run on Max's Windows machine. I would advise waiting for a little more data, maybe another run. As you can see, on my 4 year old machine running MacOS, there appears to be no difference in darcs annotate performance. Let's wait for the latest hashed-storage to be reviewed and for Max to do another benchmark run. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpMOgoA4R31r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
