Hi all, Op zondag 07 maart 2010 03:03 schreef Adolfo Builes: > So, what do you guys think about it ? At this stage I don't have > really clear in what I > should specifically work to improve "darcs annotate", but I'm sure We > can have an > interesting discussion here, which could help me to define, in what I should > specifically work if we want to see "darcs annotate" going faster.
AFAIK, what we need for a faster annotate is what we call a "filecache". By that we mean a data structure that will let us look up quickly which patches affect a given file. Benedikt Schmidt has been working on this for a long time. I don't know if this has resulted in some demo-able code yet. Maybe you should ask him (beschmi at gmail) about the current state of this work and if it would be possible to make a GSoC project out of it. By the way, this my personal number one issue with darcs. At work, I frequently curse CVS, but at least I can annotate quickly. The filecache was planned for 2.5, but I think at this point that is already becoming a very optimistic estimate again. Bye, Reinier
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
