Hi Mark,
Mark Stosberg wrote:
are the indices you use consistent with the ones shown by --number? I
just noticed that the numbering does not change with --reverse; the
newest patch is always numbered 1.
Benedikt,
I was not aware that I needed to use the output of number. This looks
like a doc-bug then.
In "darcs changes help", it current says this about --index:
select a range of patches
I believe it should say:
select a range of patches base on --number values
I didn't mean to say that the current behavior is right. Just wanted to
give another data point.
Do you think "select patches ranging from index N to M" would have been
clearer?
Best,
Benedikt
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
