On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 16:03:50 +0100, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: > In particular, I believe the following scenario is also OK: > > repo X = A;B > repo Y = A;C
... > Can anyone pick any holes in this reasoning? Not me although that isn't saying much. As long as darcs convert preserves patchinfo (which seems like the obvious thing to do), that *sounds* right. At the risk of distracting from your core point, I would also think that any permutation of A allowed by darcs is also fine, ie. just as long as it's really the same set. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgp1Grl3Hsy0d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
