Max Battcher writes: > I personally don't see a need for [better history keeping, multiple > branches]. I think there are more interesting tools that solve > similar problems that could be improved first: better/stronger > interactive file annotation/blame tools; better/stronger darcs > trackdown; tools that maybe we don't even have names for today.
All of which depend on data structures that are basically equivalent to a history DAG, ISTM. If so, perhaps it would be better to figure out what a DAGgy Darcs might look like first, rather than end up with a DAG implementation per tool. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
