Hi! Eric Kow <ko...@darcs.net> writes: [snip snip] > At this stage of the work, we can now lose the distinction between > really interesting and slightly interesting patches. We want to > set all patches to 'slightly interesting' and let the user pick out > the ones she considers to be really interesting.
oh but not losing this distinction could make a nice UI improvement! I think if you are using matchers and interactive selection, it would be nice to see if the patch you are looking at was selected by a matcher or is there because of a dependency. It would be perfect if you could ask darcs which really-interesting patch caused it to be included, but that's probably not very straightforward, implementation-wise. But even marking "slightly interesting" patches as such could reduce confusion in a few situations. What do you think? Yours, Petr. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
