Eric Kow <ko...@darcs.net> added the comment: Hi Florent,
Would you mind reviewing this? (I feel a bit guilty about shifting UI stuff to you since I'd like to avoid hyper-specialisation and improve bus-factor robustness). Not sure if you see where I'm going with this. Rejecting the main bits of this bundle may be the wisest move, as there is a strong chance I'm barking up the wrong tree with this DarcsMutuallyExclusiveOption business. I was really just trying to find the best way (in the long term) to get the default switches flipped. On the one hand, this may be silly, since one should not be flipping default switches very much. On the other hand, anything we could do to make the code more transparent should be a bonus... One bit of trouble I may run into is when you have flags with optional or required arguments instead of NoArg. You can't just compare equality on DarcsFlag because the constructors you're passing around functions :-/ I suppose I may end up having something that only works with NoArg cases and not bother with the rest. [I forget why I think this is a problem, just making a note of it now] ---------- assignedto: -> galbolle nosy: +galbolle __________________________________ Darcs bug tracker <b...@darcs.net> <http://bugs.darcs.net/patch285> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
