On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 18:21:46 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > As I understand the code is already there and working. Did anyone > compared darcs get times?
Some informal tests on the darcs darcs repo (2010-06-28): lazy get (--no-cache) goes up from 20s to 3 minutes; however, full get goes from 40 minutes to 3 minutes So this is really promising! There's a regression with lazy gets, which Alexey has been working on, hopefully with some results. In the meantime, I've filed http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1889 so that we don't accidentally release Darcs 2.5 with the regression. Note that there's also another potential perceived regression in that we get very little feedback when downloading packs. Even if it's actually much faster in reality, folks may *think* it's slower. I think we're going to need some help with http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1306 Thanks! -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, please try +44 (0)1273 64 2905.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
