Eric Kow <b...@darcs.net> writes:

> Eric Kow <ko...@darcs.net> added the comment:
>
> What is the status of this patch exactly?  I rolled it back on HEAD on 
> Petr's request (see msg11715) because I'd pushed it in accidentally.  Do 
> we not want it at all, or is it amend-requested?
We do not want it at all.

A darcs which does not exhibit issue1888 needs to be on PATH while
building release tarballs. I'd also say that 1888 is release-critical,
but it's not marked even target 2.5.

Yours,
   Petr.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to